Post by Graham
So, what is your background and what are your qualifications that enable
you to call yourself a scientist?
Qualifications? We don't need no stinking qualifications! I guess you're talking about a diploma or a certificate of some kind, maybe. There's a bunch of inept and unqualified people coming through the college doors every year and it's only going to get worse. These people 'learn' just enough to pass enough exams to graduate. Once they those college doors open to let them out, that's when the learning stops. The learning that never started.
Would you at least agree that most people in most fields are not very good at what they do? And if you do agree, then would you not also agree that the same percentages apply to doctors and scientists as well? Whether you do or not, I already know what I believe - most are morons, technicians, procedecuralists, nothing more. Now, do their flaws in any way add to my credibility? Of course not. My point is the paper on the wall means nothing. I am not on the witness stand here. I say I'm an intuitive scientist, that's what I am. I don't have to prove it - not even to myself. But thanks for asking.